Note 24: Contingencies

CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

MATTERS BEFORE ICASA
End-User and Service Charter Regulations

Allegations have been made at ICASA's Complaints and Compliance Committee (the CCC) regarding Telkom's alleged non-compliance with the requirements of the End-User and Service Charter Regulations relating to the clearance of reported faults. The CCC heard the matter and has ruled that Telkom is not in breach of the Regulations and recommended that ICASA review the Regulations. Telkom has initiated administrative review proceedings seeking to set aside the applicability of the Regulations since the CCC ruling is not binding on ICASA and the risk remains for similar referrals.

The review application is in process.

HIGH COURT
Neotel/Telkom : CCC

Neotel requested Telkom to provide access to Telkom's local loop in November 2010. Telkom declined the request and Neotel submitted a formal complaint to the CCC which made an order directing Telkom to provide Neotel access to Telkom's local loop. Telkom launched an interim relief application for an order that the CCC order not be implemented pending a review application in the High Court to review and set aside the CCC order. The parties have since agreed to a court order in terms of which Telkom withdrew its application for interim relief and ICASA in turn undertook not to implement the CCC order pending the outcome of Telkom’s application for review. No date has been set down as yet for the hearing of the review application.

Radio Surveillance Security Services Proprietary Limited (RSSS)

RSSS served two summonses on Telkom for the sums of R216 million and R10 million respectively but Telkom has settled the lesser amount. Telkom is defending the larger claim and has filed a plea and counterclaim for R22 million. Pleadings have closed and preparation for trial is under way whilst we are awaiting a date from the North Gauteng High Court.

Phutuma Networks Proprietary Limited (Phutuma)

In August 2009 Phutuma served a summons on Telkom, claiming for damages arising from a tender published by Telkom in November 2007, claiming damages in the amount of R5.5 billion. The High Court granted absolution from the instance, in Telkom's favour. The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) had initially dismissed phutuma's application for leave to appeal in October 2014. On 4 November 2014, the SCA rescinded its order granted in October 2014. In early 2015, the SCA referred the appeal back to the full bench of the North Gauteng High Court. The appeal has been set down for hearing in September 2016.

OTHER
Section 197: Labour Relations Act

As noted in the 2015 consolidated annual financial statements, Telkom invoked a process in terms of Section 197 of the Labour Relations Act, in a bid to outsource certain services as going concerns. Section 197 (7) states that Telkom and the new employers are jointly and severally liable to any employee who becomes entitled to receive a payment as a result of the employee’s dismissal for a reason relating to the new employer’s operational requirements or liquidation or sequestration. Telkom will be held liable for a period of 12 months after the date of transfer, which may result in an onerous obligation.

CONTINGENT ASSETS
TAX MATTERS

As noted in the 2015 consolidated annual financial statements, the tax treatment of the loss that arose in 2012 and 2014 financial years on the sale of foreign subsidiaries is based on a specific set of circumstances and a complex legislative environment. A tax refund received during the 2014 financial year, relating to the 2012 sale, is contingent and will only be recognised once the matter has been resolved with SARS.Refer to note 22.